Interesting article in The Register
Jan. 5th, 2004 12:52 pmDefences lacking at social network sites
UPDATE: The forthcoming security updates mentioned in the article already appear to be in place.
UPDATE: The forthcoming security updates mentioned in the article already appear to be in place.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:05 am (UTC)I'm not worried from a privacy angle, but the thought of someone erasing livejournal entries perturbs me.
Does anyone know a way to pull a copy of one's (entire) journal from livejournal, to back up locally?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:07 am (UTC)Bleedin ell!
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:25 am (UTC)I see in another comment that the LJ abuse guy receives 5 messages a day about this sort of thing. Think how many users there actually are! that's a tiny amount. Plus those people probably pissed someone off to make them want to hack their journal.
It is possible, yes. But unlikely, so I wouldn't worry too much :)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:29 am (UTC)I'm not too worried, but i do sometimes question writing so much stuff about myself on the internet. *hmm* It's good though, that they've changed it now to make it supposidly safer.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 05:33 am (UTC)Doesn't make much difference to me anyway, 99% of my entries are public anyway, and it would be no real big loss if the others were seen anyway, ho-hum :)
no subject
Date: 2004-01-05 07:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-10 07:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-12 05:02 am (UTC)