So I'll be in trouble then..?

[azekeil]

Tested for me and kissycat1000 (obviously):

Froy Marriage Rating = -277

"Generally speaking, no woman with an FR of under 250 can be recommended, especially to our less experienced friends. FR-minus women are out from the start."

Approximate Risk of Marriage = 100%

Comments

[flannelcat.livejournal.com]

Ooh terrible, I can't say that. ;)

Not unless you want a rolling pin shaped dent in your scalp. *Eyes
kissycat1000 warily*

shhhhh. Best keep quiet...

*Grin*

[azekeil.livejournal.com]

It's alright, she's fast asleep on the other sofa. :)

[flannelcat.livejournal.com]

Quick, you can creep out while she's napping! Or...um...tell her you're already married, or something...to an Albanian who needed a work visa...

"Bigamy is having more wives than you should."
"So is monogamy."

*Grinning*

[azekeil.livejournal.com]

Yes.. yes. Nah, she's mostly harmless.

Actually, I know someone who married someone like that.

Anyway, kissycat1000 doesn't want to get married after last time, so I'm fairly safe ;)

I guess that means that poly is just plain nuts then??

[flannelcat.livejournal.com]

I think the "...amorous" bit sets it off nicely, rather than...um...

erm...

What would be the word for LOTS of wives? Polyamy? As opposed to just partners...

*Shrug*

No. Polyamorous works just about fine. For some, at least.
Not for me, I think, or at least, not if *I* was the one in the relationship, if that makes sense.

I think there's a lot more importance attached to the wedding band anyhow. Me? I've been told that I will remain ever a bachelor. *Grins*

All the more scope for fluffy dates, then...

[azekeil.livejournal.com]

Polygamy.

Well I've no intention to get hitched, but then my poly-ness does still leave the way open for me to have fluffy dates too.

But 99.9% of the time, for me, it's just nice to know that the option is there than to actually follow through with it.